PSNI Blues

Reflecting on the reprimand issued by the Information Commissioner against the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) for unlawfully transferring personal data processed for the law enforcement purposes under Part 3 Data Protection Act 2018 to the USA, Handley Gill’s consultants identify the elements of a compliance programme that would mitigate against such incidents and have produced a downloadable pdf illustrating each lawful basis for transferring personal data processed under Part 3 DPA 2018 overseas.

Certify...certify me!

Handley Gill’s specialist data protection consultants consider the options and certification requirements for US entities importing personal data from the EEA following the adoption of the European Commission’s adequacy decision in respect of the Trans-Atlantic EU-US Data Privacy Framework, providing a lawful basis for transferring personal data to the US under the GDPR.

Nicola Cain16 July 2023Data Protection, Data Privacy, PERSONAL DATA, GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation, GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Data Transfer, Restricted International Data Transfers, Restricted Data Transfer, International Transfers, International data transfers, US Data Transfers, EU-US DPF, EU-US Data Privacy Framework, SCCs, Modernised SCCs, Supplementary Measures, Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework, Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework, Transfer Risk Assessment, Transfer Impact Assessment, Transfer Risk Assessment Tool, Data transfer agreement, TADPF, Trans-Atlantic EU-US Data Privacy Framework, Trans-Atlantic EU-US Data Privacy Framework Principles, DPF Principles, Privacy Shield, Privacy Shield Principles, EU-US DPF Certification, Privacy Shield Certification, Privacy Shield Self-Certification, Schrems II, Personal Data Transfer, Personal Data Export, Data exporter, Data Importer, Safe Harbor, Chapter 5 GDPR, Article 44 GDPR, Article 45 GDPR, Adequacy Decision, US Adequacy Decision, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, C(2023) 4745, TADPF Certification, Data Controller, Data Processor, Data ExporterComment

Freedom from the tyranny of supplementary measures

Handley Gill Limited’s specialist data protection consultants consider the impact of the European Commission’s adequacy decision in respect of the Trans-Atlantic EU-US Data Privacy Framework and the steps controllers and processors should take in relation to transfers of personal data from the EEA and UK to the USA.

Nicola Cain11 July 2023Data Protection, Personal Data, GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, UK GDPR, UK GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION, Data Transfer, Personal Data Transfer, International Transfers, International data transfers, Safe Harbor, Privacy Shield, EU-US Data Privacy Framework, Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework, Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework, Chapter 5 GDPR, Chapter 5 UK GDPR, Article 44 GDPR, Article 44 UK GDPR, Article 45 GDPR, Article 45 UK GDPR, Article 45(2) GDPR, Article 45(2) UK GDPR, Adequacy Decision, Schrems II, Adequacy Regulations, Section 17A Data Protection Act 2018, S.17A Data Protection Act 2018, S.17A DPA 2018, DPA 2018, Data Protection Act 2018, Standard contractual clauses, Standard data protection clauses, Supplementary Measures, Recommendations 01/2020 on measures that supplement transfer tools to ensure compliance with the EU level of protection of personal data, Transfer Risk Assessment, Transfer Impact Assessment, International Data Transfer Agreement, International Data Transfer Addendum, IDTA, SCCs, Modernised SCCs, Modernised Standard Contractual Clauses, Executive Order 14086, Qualifying State, TADPF, US Data Transfers, UK-US Data Bridge, Executive Order on Enhancing Safeguards for United States Signals Intelligence Activities, FISA 702, Prism, Upstream, EU-US DPF, Data Controller, Data Processor, Data exporter, Data ImporterComment

A bridge to nowhere?

A commitment to establishing a UK-US data bridge, which would take the form of adequacy regulations being issued by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 17A Data Protection Act 2018, has been announced. Since this bridge is likely to be contingent on the European Commission issuing its own adequacy decision, and the draft has recently been rejected by the European Parliament, data exporters will be reliant on the Commission ramming through the roadblock or will find themselves stuck in traffic on the UK-US data flyover.

Nicola Cain18 June 2023Data Protection, Personal Data, GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation, UK GDPR, UK GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION, Privacy Shield, Schrems II, Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework, Adequacy Decision, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Safe Harbor, Adequacy Regulations, UK Adequacy, Executive Order on Enhancing Safeguards for United States Signals Intelligence Activities, Executive Order On Enhancing Safeguards For United States Signals Intelligence Activities, EU-US Data Privacy Framework, UK-US Data Bridge, Chapter 5 GDPR, Chapter 5 UK GDPR, Article 45 GDPR, Article 45 UK GDPR, Article 46 GDPR, Article 46 UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018, Section 17A Data Protection Act 2018, s17A Data Protection Act 2018, Qualifying State, Executive Order 14086, TADPF, European Parliament, Committee on Civil Liberties, Committee on Civil Liberties Justice & Home Affairs, LIBE Committee, European Data Protection Board, EDPB, Opinion 5/2023, German-American Data Protection Day, DoJ, Department of Justice, Standard contractual clauses, Standard data protection clauses, Supplementary Measures, Transfer Risk Assessment, Transfer Impact Assessment, Derogation, Data Transfer, Data transfer agreement, US Data Transfers, International Transfers, International data transfers, International Data Transfer Risk Assessment, Data Controller, Data Processor, Data exporter, Data ImporterComment

Risky business

New guidance issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office on the approach to assessing the risk of restricted ex-UK international data transfers may ease restrictions on transfers of personal data to the US and presents an opportunity to revisit ex-UK international data transfers that had previously been rejected as non-compliant.

Nicola Cain20 November 2022Data Protection, Personal Data, GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, UK GDPR, UK GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION, Article 46 GDPR, Article 46 UK GDPR, Article 46(2)(c) UK GDPR, Article 46(2)(c) GDPR, DATA PROTECTION ACT 2018, DPA 2018, Data Transfer, US Data Transfers, Restricted Data Transfer, International data transfers, Restricted International Data Transfers, DPC22, Emma Bate, Information Commissioner's Office, Information Commissioner, ICO, EDPB, European Data Protection Board, International Data Transfer Risk Assessment, IDTRA, Transfer Risk Assessment, TRA, Data export, Personal Data Export, Data Exporter, Supplementary Measures, Data Controller, Data Processor, Data Importer, Schrems II, C-311/18, Transatlantic Data Privacy Framework, Executive Order on Enhancing Safeguards for United States Signals Intelligence Activities, Appropriate Safeguards, Recommendations 01/2020 on measures that supplement transfer tools to ensure compliance with the EU level of protection of personal data, EDPB Recommendation 01/2020, International Data Transfer Agreement, International Data Transfer Addendum, IDTA, Standard Contractual Clauses, Modernised Standard Contractual Clauses, International Transfers, Privacy, Data Privacy, Human Rights, Transfer Risk Assessment Tool, Data Protection & Digital Information Bill, Adequacy Decision, UK Adequacy, Bill of Rights, Transfer Impact Assessment, TIAComment