Get Outta My Pub!

Handley Gill‘s specialist responsible AI and human rights consultants explain the basis for the argument in their response to the government’s consultation on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI) that proposals to create an exception to the exclusive rights of copyright holders to permit web scraping/data mining for the training validation and testing of AI models infringe human rights.

Government by Gaslight

Handley Gill’s specialist responsible AI consultants respond to the Government’s consultation on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (AI), in which the Government proposes to create a copyright exception for data mining which would require rights holders to opt out through approved means and that AI developers be transparent about the sources of their AI training material.

Nicola Cain25 February 2025Artificial Intelligence, AI, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Copyright & AI Consultation, Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Consultation, Web Scraping, AI Training, Copyright Infringement, Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, CDPA 1988, Data Mining, Consultation, Consultation Response, AI Regulation, Public LawComment

Scrape, scrape, scrape away

Handley Gill’s specialist responsible artificial intelligence (AI) consultants summarise the UK government’s consultation on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence and consider the implications of the proposed copyright reforms for rights holders.

Scraping together a lawful basis

As the Information Commissioner’s Office consults on the lawful basis for web scraping by AI developers to train generative AI models under the UK GDPR, Handley Gill’s specialist data protection and artificial intelligence (AI) consultants comment on the issues arising and share their consultation response.

Nicola Cain1 March 2024Data Protection, Personal Data, Data Privacy, UK GDPR, GDPR, UK GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION, General Data Protection Regulation, ARTICLE 6 UK GDPR, Article 6(1)(f) UK GDPR, Legitimate Interests, Legitimate Interests Assessment, Information Commissioner, Information Commissioner's Office, Consultation, Consultation Response, Artificial Intelligence, AI, Generative AI, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Rights, Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Web Scraping, AI Training, AI Training Data, Intellectual Property Office, IPO, A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation, Voluntary code of practice on copyright and AI, Sir Patrick Vallance, Pro-Innovation Regulation for Digital Technologies Review, House of Lords Communications & Digital Committee, Report on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI, Data Mining, Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, AI Regulation, Joint statement on data scraping and data protection, Data scraping, Generative AI & Data ProtectionComment

AI Bootcamp Part II

In Part 2 of our 5 part Artificial Intelligence (AI) Bootcamp, we consider the risks associated with developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including to intellectual property rights (IPR), data protection and privacy, cyber security, human rights and the existential risk to humanity. In Part 1 of our AI Bootcamp we considered the terms and concepts needed to understand what AI is and how it works. In Parts 3-4 we will consider the risks of using and even not using AI, while in Part 5 of our AI Bootcamp, we will focus on AI regulation.

Handley Gill Limited